- No. The Security Rule was written to allow flexibility for covered entities to implement security measures that best fit their organizational needs. The Security Rule does not specify minimum requirements for personal computer operating systems, but it does mandate requirements for information systems that contain electronic protected health information (e-PHI). Therefore, as part of the information system, the security capabilities of the operating system may be used to comply with technical safeguards standards and implementation specifications such as audit controls, unique user identification, integrity, person or entity authentication, or transmission security. Additionally, any known security vulnerabilities of an operating system should be considered in the covered entity’s risk analysis (e.g., does an operating system include known vulnerabilities for which a security patch is unavailable, e.g., because the operating system is no longer supported by its manufacturer).
- Additionally, any known security vulnerabilities of an operating system should be considered in the covered entity’s risk analysis
Within the electronic code of Federal regulations or e-CFR(found at www.ecfr.gov), Title 45, part 164 subpart c,
§164.308(5)(a)(1) states:
- Security reminders (Addressable). Periodic security updates.
and §164.308(1)(i):
- Standard: Security management process. Implement policies and procedures to prevent, detect, contain, and correct security violations.
and §164.308(1)(A):
- Risk analysis (Required). Conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic protected health information held by the covered entity or business associate.
So i would say with this evidence and the ever decreasing prices of computers, that any company would be farther ahead to pay three to five hundred dollars to replace the computer rather then the fines that could be imposed for the HIPAA Violations.
No comments:
Post a Comment